The Ironist (Gen-Z) and the Ground

They are the same man. Twenty-four. Same apartment with the same blue light from the same screen at 1 AM. Same job he doesn’t hate but can’t take seriously — content operations at a company that makes software for other companies that make software. Same group chat. Same feeds. Same fluency in a language that treats everything as material and nothing as sacred.

He meets a woman named Elise at a friend’s birthday party. She’s arguing with someone about whether a movie is good or just aesthetically correct. She’s losing the argument but she’s right and the way she’s right — unguarded, her voice doing a thing she doesn’t know it’s doing — goes through him.

In one version of his life, he walks over and says something clever.

In the other, he walks over and says nothing and hands her a drink and she looks at him and he looks at her and neither of them is clever and neither of them is performing and the moment is naked and terrifying and over in three seconds.

Month One

The First Man

He gets her number. He texts her the next day — not too early, not too late. The text is good. It’s a reference to the argument at the party, slightly self-deprecating, with a trailing irony that signals interest without committing to it. She responds with a laughing emoji and a counter-reference. The volley has begun.

They text for a week before he asks her out. The asking-out is embedded in a longer message so it can’t be isolated as a vulnerable act. If she says no, the message still works as a message. He’s built a trapdoor into every sentence he’s ever sent anyone.

She says yes. They go to a bar he’s chosen because it’s the kind of bar that communicates something about him without him having to say it directly — a little divey, a little intentional, the kind of place that says I have taste but I’m not trying too hard, which of course is trying very hard but the trying is invisible, which is the whole game.

The date goes well. They’re both funny. They riff. The conversation moves fast — references, callbacks, ironic escalation. It’s like improv. They’re both very good at improv. At the end of the night he walks her to her car and they kiss and the kiss is good and he goes home and lies in bed and feels something and immediately starts composing the text he’ll send about it, and the composing is the first layer between himself and the feeling, and the layer goes on so fast he doesn’t notice it, the way you don’t notice the glass going up on a car window.

He tells the group chat: I think I met someone. The responses are supportive in the way his friends are supportive — half-sincere, half-roast. Someone says down bad and someone says let’s see how long this lasts and he laughs because that’s what you do and the laughing is a second layer and now there are two layers between him and the thing that happened when she looked at him at the party and neither layer is visible from the outside and from the outside he looks like a man who is happy about a date.

The Second Man

He gets her number. He texts her the next day: I liked talking to you. Do you want to get dinner?

The text is plain. He reads it back and something in him cringes — it’s too direct, too earnest, too legible. Anyone could read it and know exactly what he wants. The exposure is total. He sends it anyway because the alternative is building a sentence with an escape hatch and he’s tired of escape hatches, tired of the architecture of plausible deniability that he’s been constructing since he was fifteen and learned that sincerity gets you killed.

She says yes. They go to a restaurant that’s neither cool nor uncool. It’s just a restaurant. The food is fine. The conversation is different from what he’s used to — slower, with gaps. He doesn’t fill the gaps with bits. He lets them be gaps. In one of the gaps she says, You’re kind of quiet, and he says, I’m listening, and she looks at him with an expression he can’t decode and the not-decoding is itself a kind of intimacy — the willingness to not know what’s happening.

He walks her to her car. They don’t kiss. He wants to and he can feel that she might want to and the wanting sits between them like heat and he doesn’t close the distance because the wanting is enough for now, more than enough, it’s a cathedral.

He goes home and lies in bed and feels what he feels and doesn’t compose anything. The feeling is large and unnamed and he lets it be large and unnamed. This takes effort. The reflex to package it — to turn it into a story, a post, a bit for the group chat — is so deep it’s muscular. He has to consciously not reach for his phone the way you’d consciously not scratch an itch.

He doesn’t scratch. The itch fades. What’s underneath the itch is — he doesn’t know what it is. But it’s warm and it doesn’t have an audience and it’s his.

Month Three

The First Man

They’re dating. Officially, kind of. The kind of is important. They haven’t had the conversation because the conversation requires a sincerity neither of them can access without ironic scaffolding. They’re exclusive in practice and ambiguous in language and the ambiguity is a shared project, a collaborative fiction that protects them both from the vulnerability of saying I want this to be real.

The sex is good. Performatively good — they’re both attentive, both responsive, both aware of what the other expects. He’s learned about sex the way his generation learns about everything: online, theoretically, with an emphasis on optimization. He knows techniques. He knows what to do. What he doesn’t know is how to be in his body while doing it. There’s a camera in the room that no one placed there. An audience that doesn’t exist. He’s having sex and watching himself have sex and the watching is so habitual it doesn’t register as a distortion anymore. It’s just how experience works.

She stays over. In the morning she wears his shirt and makes coffee and the image is so perfectly composed — the light, the shirt, the coffee, her — that he almost takes a photo. He doesn’t, but the impulse is there, and the impulse is the thing: the immediate translation of experience into content. Not to post. He’d never post it. But to have, to capture, to convert the raw moment into a format that can be stored and reviewed and, if necessary, ironized.

She catches him looking at her. What? she says.

Nothing, he says. You look good.

She smiles. The smile is real. He receives the smile through three layers of glass and it arrives muted, like a voice through a wall. He can hear it. He can’t feel it.

The Second Man

They’re dating. He tells her so one night over Thai food that’s too spicy. He says, I want to be with you. Like, actually. Not ambiguously. The words come out clumsy and overliteral and he watches her face do something complicated and fast.

She says, That’s very direct.

He says, Yeah.

She says, I don’t know how to respond to that without making a joke.

He says, You could just respond to it.

A silence. The restaurant clatters around them. She puts down her fork. She says, I want that too. Her voice is different — lower, unprotected. He can hear what it costs her to say the sentence without ironic wrapping. The cost is the same as his. They grew up in the same ocean. The water is the same water.

The sex is awkward sometimes. He’s in his body but his body is clumsy, uncertain, not the body he’s seen in the references he grew up on. He loses the rhythm. He laughs at himself. She laughs at him. The laughter is not a deflection — it’s the real sound of two people who don’t know what they’re doing and are doing it anyway.

One night, after, she’s lying on his chest and she says, Why are you different?

He says, What do you mean?

She says, You’re just — here. Most people aren’t here. I’m usually not here.

He doesn’t know how to answer. The answer, if he had one, would be something about a sentence he read once — the eye through which I see God is the same eye through which God sees me — but that would sound insane in this context so he says, I’m trying to be, and she puts her hand on his chest and the hand is warm and the warmth goes all the way down, through the skin, through the ribs, to whatever’s underneath, the ground, the thing that holds him.

Month Six

The First Man

They have their first real fight. It’s about something small — he cancelled plans to see friends, she felt deprioritized, the kind of thing that’s about everything and nothing. The fight escalates the way fights do: accusations, defenses, the sudden excavation of grievances neither of them knew they were storing.

She says something that hurts. Not cruel — honest. She says, Sometimes I feel like you’re not really here. Like you’re watching us from outside.

He wants to say: You’re right. I am. I’ve been outside everything my whole life. The outside is where I live. I don’t know how to get in. I don’t know if there’s an in to get to.

He doesn’t say this. He says, That’s not fair. He says it with a tone that communicates injury without displaying it, the way a building communicates damage by leaning slightly without collapsing. He’s mastered this — the art of conveying feeling without being caught feeling. It’s the core competency of his generation.

She cries. He doesn’t know what to do with her crying. Not because he’s callous — he’s not callous. He’s flooded. The tears are too real, too unmediated, too close. They bypass every layer he’s built and hit something raw and the rawness panics him and the panic manifests as distance and the distance confirms her complaint and the loop closes.

They make up. The making up is good — they talk, they listen, they reach a provisional understanding. But the understanding is negotiated, like a treaty. Two parties with interests, finding terms. Something in him knows this isn’t what making up is supposed to feel like but he doesn’t have a reference for what it’s supposed to feel like because every reference he has is either a performance or a critique of a performance.

He posts a photo of them later that week. They look happy. They are happy, intermittently, in the way that two people behind glass can be happy — real emotion experienced at one remove, like watching a sunset through a window. You see it. You don’t feel the heat.

The Second Man

They have their first real fight. Same trigger — cancelled plans, the architecture of priorities. The fight escalates.

She says something that hurts: Sometimes I don’t think you need me. You’re so — settled. Like you’d be fine without me.

The words land and he feels them land — a detonation in the chest, specific and hot. Not fine. Not settled. Terrified, actually, that she thinks this, because the truth is the opposite — he needs her in a way that embarrasses him, a way that has no ironic frame, a way that is simple and total and makes him feel like a child.

He says, That’s not true.

She says, Then show me.

He doesn’t know how. For a moment the old reflex fires — the joke, the deflection, the retreat to cleverness. But he’s been practicing, for months now, the discipline of staying in the room when the room gets hot. Not a meditation technique. Not a framework. Just the brute physical act of not leaving — not physically, not ironically, not through the escape hatch of wit.

He says, I need you so much it scares me. I don’t know how to say that in a way that doesn’t sound — I don’t know. Pathetic.

She says, It doesn’t sound pathetic.

He says, It sounds pathetic to me.

She says, That’s your problem.

She’s right. It is his problem. The problem is that the culture he was raised in treats need as weakness and sincerity as cringe and vulnerability as content and he’s been swimming in that water so long he can’t always tell when he’s wet. The practice — the daily, unglamorous practice — is learning to be wet and not drown.

They don’t make up neatly. The fight lingers. They go to bed with it unresolved and the unresolution is uncomfortable the way a bone setting is uncomfortable — necessary, precise, painful in a way that means something is aligning.

In the morning he makes her coffee and she takes it and their hands touch on the mug and the touch is small and deliberate and it says: I’m still here. Are you still here?

She is.

Month Nine

The First Man

She meets his parents. The visit is fine — pleasant, uneventful. His mother likes her. His father asks vague questions about her job. They all eat dinner together and the dinner is the kind of dinner families have: adequate food, competent conversation, the familiar dance of people who are related performing the motions of closeness.

Afterward, in the car, Elise says, Your parents are nice.

He says, Yeah.

She says, You were different around them. More — contained.

He was. He’s always been contained around his parents. Not because they’re cold — they’re not cold. They’re adequate. They loved him adequately. The adequate love produced an adequate self — functional, capable, polished to a high shine, hollow in a way that doesn’t show up on any scan.

She says, Do they know you?

The question is so large he almost drives off the road. Do they know you. He wants to say yes, of course and the of course would be a lie. Not because they’re bad parents. Because he never gave them anything to know. He gave them the performance. The grades, the manners, the curated version. He’s been giving everyone the curated version for so long that the question of whether there’s a non-curated version underneath feels genuinely open.

I don’t know, he says. And for once the honesty is not a bit. It’s a hole in the floor and he’s looking down into it and it’s dark.

The Second Man

She meets his parents. His mother talks too much. His father is awkward in the way that fathers are awkward when they’re trying to impress their son’s girlfriend — he tells a long story about a fishing trip that has no point and his mother interrupts twice and his father starts over and Elise listens to the whole thing and at the end says, That’s a great story, and his father beams.

In the car, Elise says, Your dad really loves you.

He says, He doesn’t know how to say it.

She says, He doesn’t need to. It’s in the fishing story.

He’s quiet. She’s right. The fishing story — pointless, rambling, told badly — is his father’s love language. The story is not about fishing. The story is about the fact that his father remembers every detail of a day they spent together twenty years ago and has polished those details into a narrative he carries everywhere and offers to anyone who’ll listen. The story is a reliquary. His father doesn’t know the word reliquary. He doesn’t need to.

He thinks about Eckhart: God is not found in the soul by adding anything, but by a process of subtraction. His father is not a mystic. His father is a retired plumber who watches too much cable news and can’t work his phone. But his father’s love has been subtracted down to its essence — a fishing story, offered without irony, without protection, without any awareness that it might be received as anything other than what it is.

He calls his father the next day. They don’t talk about anything important. His father tells him about a leak he fixed for a neighbor. He tells his father about a beer he’s brewing. The conversation is fifteen minutes of nothing that is actually everything and when he hangs up he sits in his car and feels the weight of it — the ordinary, unremarkable weight of being someone’s son — and the weight is enough. The weight is the ground.

Year One

The First Man

They move in together. The apartment is nice. They furnish it collaboratively, which means they furnish it by sending each other links with comments that are half-sincere and half-ironic — this is very us (meaning: I want this but I need you to want it first so I’m framing my desire as an observation about our shared aesthetic).

Cohabitation reveals things. She leaves hair in the drain. He leaves dishes in the sink. These are not problems. These are the ordinary frictions of shared space and they’d be navigable except that neither of them can address them directly. The hair in the drain becomes a bit. The dishes in the sink become a running joke. The joke becomes a grievance and the grievance becomes a silence and the silence becomes the thing they don’t talk about, which joins the other things they don’t talk about, forming a small continent of avoidance that takes up more room than the apartment.

He loves her. He’s almost certain he loves her. But the love is expressed through the idiom they share — the bits, the references, the shared language of people who bond through cleverness. And cleverness, it turns out, is not a load-bearing material. You can build a social life on it. You can build a career. You cannot build a home. The loads a home bears — grief, need, boredom, the Tuesday night where nothing happens and the nothing is either emptiness or intimacy depending on whether you can sit in it — these loads require something denser.

She says I love you for the first time on a Thursday. She says it quickly, almost accidentally, while leaving for work. The words are out before the scaffolding can go up.

He says it back. He means it. He also hears himself saying it and the hearing creates the gap — the tiny, fatal gap between the feeling and the observation of the feeling — and the gap is so familiar now that he doesn’t even register it as a problem. It’s just the acoustics of his inner life. Everything with a slight echo. Everything experienced once and then immediately reviewed.

The Second Man

They move in together. The apartment is small. They furnish it with her mother’s old couch and a table he finds on the street and a lamp from a thrift store that gives the living room a warm, amber quality neither of them planned.

Cohabitation reveals things. She is messy in specific ways — shoes by the door, mail on every surface, a coffee mug ecosystem on the nightstand. He is rigid in ways he didn’t know about — the towels folded a certain way, the kitchen clean before bed, a need for order that borders on compulsion.

They argue about the towels. It’s a stupid argument and they both know it’s stupid and the knowing doesn’t help because the towels aren’t about towels. They’re about control, about the way he manages anxiety through his environment, about the way she resists being managed. The argument is ugly and small and he hates himself during it and she hates him during it and afterward they sit on the couch — her mother’s old couch, with the fabric worn thin on the left arm — and they don’t speak for a while.

Then she says, I don’t want to fold the towels your way.

He says, I know.

She says, But I’ll put my shoes in the closet.

He says, And I’ll stop being insane about the kitchen.

It’s not a negotiation. It’s not a treaty between parties. It’s two people sitting on a couch admitting what they are — a man who folds towels to feel safe, a woman who leaves shoes by the door because she’s always half-leaving, always keeping one foot near the exit. The admissions aren’t pretty. They don’t need to be.

She says I love you on a Sunday morning while they’re doing nothing. Not leaving for work, not after sex, not in a moment that would give the words a frame. Just Sunday. Just coffee. Just the light and the quiet and him sitting across from her reading something and the words come out of her like breath — involuntary, necessary, ungoverned.

He looks up. He says, I love you too.

No echo. No gap. The words go out and hit nothing and keep going.

Year Two

The First Man

Something is wrong and he can’t name it. The relationship is good — stable, comfortable, compatible. They have routines. They have inside jokes. They have a shared calendar and a system for groceries and a rhythm that works. From the outside, and from most of the inside, it’s a functional partnership between two intelligent people who care about each other.

But there’s a layer he can’t reach. Or a layer she can’t reach. Or a layer between them that neither can penetrate, and the layer is made of something so thin and transparent they can barely see it — just a faint shimmer, like heat distortion, between his face and hers.

He starts watching videos about relationships. Attachment theory, communication frameworks, love languages. He takes the quizzes. He’s anxious-avoidant, which explains things, which makes him feel better for a day and then worse, because the explanation is another layer, another frame between himself and the experience. Now when she pulls away he thinks anxious attachment activated instead of just feeling the pull, and the thinking inoculates him against the feeling, and the inoculation is the disease.

They have sex and it’s fine. It’s been fine for a while. Fine is the word that means nothing is wrong and nothing is alive. They’ve settled into a competence that substitutes for presence. Both of them can do this in their sleep. Neither of them is awake.

He lies next to her afterward and stares at the ceiling and thinks: I am twenty-six years old and I am already narrating my life instead of living it and I don’t know how to stop because the narration is the only self I have.

He doesn’t say this. He turns over. He opens his phone. The blue light fills the room.

The Second Man

They hit the wall. Every relationship has one — the place where the early energy runs out and what’s left is two people in a room and the room is quiet and the quiet is either a beginning or an end.

He feels it arrive. Not a crisis — a settling. The weight of dailiness. The way she chews. The way he breathes. The tiny abrasions of proximity that accumulate until you’re raw in places you didn’t know you had.

He doesn’t research it. He doesn’t watch videos. He sits with it the way he’s learned to sit with things — not patiently, not gracefully, just stubbornly. The way you’d sit in a room that’s too hot because leaving means you’ll never come back.

He tells her: I feel stuck.

She says, Stuck how?

He says, Stuck like — I love you and I’m bored and I don’t know if bored is bad or just what it feels like when you stop performing.

The sentence hangs there. It’s the most dangerous thing he’s said in the relationship — more dangerous than I need you, more dangerous than I love you. Because it’s admitting that love doesn’t solve the problem of being a person in a room with another person. That the ground doesn’t make it easy. That what’s underneath the performance is not bliss but something plainer: the discipline of attention. Looking at someone you’ve already seen. Seeing them again anyway.

She says, I’m bored too.

They sit with it. Two people, bored, in love, on a couch with worn fabric. The boredom is not a symptom. It’s the entrance to something the culture doesn’t have a name for because the culture only values what accelerates and boredom decelerates and the deceleration is where the ground shows through.

He thinks: This is it. Not the fireworks. Not the performance. This — the quiet, the ordinary, the willingness to stay in the room when the room is just a room.

Eckhart: God is not attained by a process of addition to anything in the soul, but by a process of subtraction.

Subtract the performance. Subtract the cleverness. Subtract the audience. Subtract the narration. What’s left is a man and a woman on a couch on a Tuesday and the Tuesday is not content. The Tuesday is the ground. And the ground holds.

Year Three

The First Man

She leaves.

Not all at once. In stages. First the small withdrawals — a night out with friends that goes longer, a weekend trip she doesn’t invite him on, a text response time that stretches from minutes to hours. Then the medium withdrawals — the separate bedtime, the headphones at dinner, the particular quality of silence that isn’t peace but retreat. Then the conversation.

I don’t feel like you see me, she says.

He wants to protest. He sees her. He sees her constantly. He can describe her in granular detail — her habits, her preferences, her attachment patterns, the way her voice changes when she’s about to cry. He has observed her more carefully than anyone he’s ever known.

You observe me, she says, as if hearing his thought. That’s not the same thing.

She’s right and the rightness is devastating because it reveals the central error of his life, the error he’s been making since he was fifteen and learned to live behind glass. He thought seeing and observing were the same thing. They’re not. Observing is what a camera does. Seeing is what happens when you let the other person’s existence change you — when you receive them instead of recording them, when the light gets in rather than bouncing off.

She packs a bag. She’ll come back for the rest. He stands in the apartment — their apartment, already not their apartment — and the silence is total and the silence is what’s been there all along, underneath the bits and the banter and the jokes, the silence of a man who was never quite in the room.

He doesn’t cry. He wants to. The crying is there, he can feel it, a pressure behind his face. But the release mechanism is jammed. The layers are too thick. The glass is too thick. He’s spent a decade building something between himself and his own experience and the something is so well-constructed that even now, in the moment that should shatter it, it holds.

He sits on the couch. He opens his phone. He closes it. He opens it. He closes it.

He leaves it closed.

The silence fills the room. The room fills him. There’s nothing between him and the feeling — no bit, no frame, no narration — and the nothing is unbearable and the unbearable is — maybe — the beginning. The very first moment of something that people used to call, before the word was ruined, being alive.

The Second Man

They get engaged. Not with a plan. He doesn’t buy a ring first. They’re in the kitchen — she’s cooking, he’s sitting on the counter, they’re arguing about whether garlic powder is acceptable (she says yes, he says never, this is an irreconcilable difference they’ve been performing for two years) — and he says, Marry me.

She stops stirring. Garlic powder in hand.

What? she says.

Marry me, he says again. Plainer the second time. Dumber. More real.

She says, You don’t have a ring.

He says, I have garlic powder.

She laughs. The laugh turns into something else — not crying exactly, but the place where laughing and crying share a border. She puts down the garlic powder. She says, Okay.

Okay?

Okay. Yes. Okay.

They stand in the kitchen. The pasta is overcooking. The garlic powder is on the counter between them like a sacrament. He pulls her in and holds her, and the holding is not a symbol of anything. It’s the thing itself. Two bodies, one kitchen, an overcooked pot of pasta, and beneath all of it the ground — steady, unsought, given.

He thinks, briefly, of the version of himself who would have planned this. Who would have bought the ring and chosen the restaurant and crafted the moment with an eye toward how it would be told. That version of himself would have gotten a better story. This version gets the kitchen. The garlic powder. The burnt pasta. The look on her face before she knew she was going to say okay — the look that was pure, ungoverned, unrehearsed, the face behind the face, the self before the self gets dressed.

He’ll take the kitchen.

Eckhart: What a man takes in by contemplation, he pours out in love.

He’s not sure he’s ever contemplated anything. But he’s looked. He’s looked at her, really looked, the way you look at something when you’ve stopped trying to see what you want and started seeing what’s there. And what’s there is a woman with garlic powder in her hand saying okay with her whole body, and the whole body is the sermon, and the sermon doesn’t need a church.

Epilogue: On the Glass

The ironic self is the most sophisticated defense mechanism a culture has ever produced. It emerged from conditions no previous generation faced — total surveillance, algorithmic curation of identity, the collapse of private space, the weaponization of sincerity. It is not a failure of character. It is an adaptation to an environment that punishes the unguarded.

The problem is that it works. The glass protects. The ironic distance keeps you safe from cringe, from rejection, from the specific vulnerability of wanting something and saying so. The armor is good armor. The castle is well-built. And the man inside the castle is dying of something that looks like comfort and feels like nothing.

Eckhart preached to beguines — women who lived religious lives without institutional protection. They were exposed. They had no order to shield them, no rule to hide behind. What Eckhart offered them was not safety but a more radical exposure: the claim that God is closer than the self, that the ground is nearer than the floor you built, that what you’re protecting yourself from is the same thing that would save you.

The ironic self protects itself from experience. The Eckhartian self lets experience through. The difference sounds simple and is almost impossible because the glass went up so early and so invisibly that most people don’t know they’re behind it. They think the glass is their eyes. They think the slight distance between themselves and their own lives is just how experience feels. They think the echo is the voice.

It’s not.

The voice without the echo is terrifying. It’s plain and direct and can be hurt and sounds like marry me in a kitchen with garlic powder and no plan. It sounds like I’m bored and I love you on a couch on a Tuesday. It sounds like a fishing story told by a man who doesn’t know he’s saying I love you because the words aren’t big enough so he puts his love in a boat and rows it out onto a lake and offers the whole lake to anyone who’ll sit still long enough to hear it.

The first man is not a villain. He’s a casualty of a coherent and self-reinforcing system that was built to protect him and did protect him and in protecting him kept out the one thing he needed, which was the world, which was always right there, which is always right there, on the other side of the glass.

The glass is not the self. The glass is what the self hides behind when it’s afraid that what it is — small, needful, easily hurt, desperate to love and be loved — is not enough.

It is enough. It was always enough. The ground doesn’t need the glass. The ground holds everything — the sincerity and the cringe, the need and the embarrassment, the garlic powder and the burnt pasta and the Tuesday and the silence and the fishing story and the light through the window landing on someone’s hands.

One of them built a castle.

One of them burned it down and found he was already home.

—

You may also like: